As well, there are discussions of satanic and sexual rituals, and a brief depiction of a couple under a blanket on an altar presumably having sex. Another male character appears completely naked (seen mostly from the rear) and physically abuses and mutilates his body as a sign of his dedication to Jesus. Self-mutilation, murders with guns, and scenes of harsh hand-to-hand violence involving men and women are depicted throughout. (Without giving too much away, the film says it wasn’t Peter.) Yet even those not weighing the religious doctrines, will still find bothersome issues like the particularly gory violence and sexual content. First, Christians-especially Catholics-may be offended, or at least troubled, by the implications regarding Christ’s life, and the claims as to whom he left in charge of his church. If you’re a parent wondering if this historically set drama holds concerns for family viewing, the answer is “yes,” from various perspectives.
His cryptographic skills will pull him into a scheme full of twists and turns, with a climax involving the divinity of Jesus Christ, his relationship with Mary Magdalene, and whether direct descendents of the “Savior of Man” walk the Earth today. But what the professor doesn’t know is he’s embarked on a far more dangerous journey than a run from the authorities. Offering to help Langdon avoid arrest, the two escape the museum, and flee into the streets of Paris. Begging his trust, the young woman passionately explains that he is the chief suspect in the investigation. Accompanying the officials to the Louvre, Langdon is shocked to see the victim’s naked body covered in various cryptic signs written in the man’s own blood (of which we see a great deal).Īlso at the grande mus0圎9e is Sophie Neveu (Audrey Tautou), who is introduced as the granddaughter of the deceased. He’s in France making a presentation and signing his new book when the local police approach and tell him that his friend has been murdered. Professor Robert Langdon (Tom Hanks) is a man who lives to break codes and discover the secret patterns of numerals, letters, and symbols in the monotony of daily life.
And then there’s the huge audience who have read the novel by Dan Brown, upon which this movie is based, who anticipated seeing their favorite book put to film.įor those who have only heard the hoopla, the controversial plot goes something like this: Meanwhile, opinions from religious organizations regarding the story’s re-writing of the role of Jesus Christ and other New Testament figures also increased as the release date drew nigh.
For more than a year before gracing the silver screen, previews and promotions have been dangled in front of the public eye. The slew of information being thrown at us was overwhelming the first viewing, which is probably why we only noticed these things the second time we watched The Da Vinci Code.If there is one thing The Da Vinci Code hasn’t run short of, it’s hype. As for the plot, Robert Langdon (Hanks) is chased through Paris by a malicious, religious zealot named Silas (played by Marvel alumni Paul Bettany) while he unravels a 2,000-year-old secret. The result was an elaborate scavenger hunt through history, complete with murder and mystery. Mega-star Tom Hanks was tapped for the lead, and direction was handled by the legendary Ron Howard.
Needless to say, producers spared no expense.
Written by Dan Brown, The Da Vinci Code is one of the best-selling novels of all time, with over 80 million copies sold, and this type of popularity requires cinematic adaptation. The Da Vinci Code is able to weave truth and fiction so efficiently that it still has historians dancing in circles. That's no surprise when you consider its scandalous plot involving the divinity of Jesus Christ. The Da Vinci Code was published in 2003 and immediately caused a massive uproar among the religious community.